Sunday, December 27, 2015

Apple Pay in China in partnership with UnionPay

Taken from Business Insider Intelligence article
US MOBILE PAYMENT HEAVYWEIGHTS ENTER CHINA

Apple announced plans to launch Apple Pay in China in partnership with UnionPay, the country’s largest interbank processor and card network, as well as with 15 local banks. UnionPay cardholders will be able to add their bank cards to Apple Pay and use the service to make payments via all eligible Apple devices. The partnership will likely begin in early 2016, pending testing and security certification from Chinese regulators.

Earlier in December, UnionPay also announced a proprietary HCE-based mobile wallet for Android customers. And last week, Samsung signed a similar agreement with UnionPay that will give cardholders access to Samsung's wallet. 

Securing the partnership with UnionPay was critical for Apple Pay, given that the card network holds a near-monopoly over China's card ecosystem. Though the country is beginning to open up its processing ecosystem to global networks like Visa, MasterCard, and Amex, UnionPay still handles the vast majority of card transactions in China. And it has a wide reach — the network has issued over 5 billion cards, which are accepted at 26 million merchants and 1.9 million ATMs

Apple and Samsung will help bolster an already thriving mobile payments market.

Two third-party players compose the majority of the mobile payments market. Alibaba’s Alipay and Tencent’s Tenpay, both of which are available for iOS and Android users, comprise over 90% of the mobile payments market. That means that in order for operating system-based wallets like Apple Pay to succeed in China, they'll either need to give users a compelling reason to switch mobile wallets, or partner with mobile wallet providers so that they don't have to. And the latter is likely, given that Alibaba CEO Jack Ma has noted on multiple occasions that he's interested in developing a partnership between Alipay and Apple. And those apps are more universally accepted than the new products. That’s because Alipay and Tenpay are barcode-based, which means customers can pay with them at any merchant with a handheld scanner. Apple Pay is NFC-based, which means it's only compatible with NFC-enabled “QuickPass” UnionPay terminals. There are reportedly 5 million of these terminals in China, but that’s a small fraction of the places that accept Alipay and Tenpay, according to The Wall Street Journal

Sunday, December 06, 2015

Black Friday's Takeaways

Taken from cellum blog 's article

Ten takeaways from Black Friday’s cyber humiliation

For years people have been making dark jokes about “Black Friday,” the day in late November when retailers in the US – and an increasing number of countries around the world – mark the start of the holiday shopping season with huge discounts. This year, however, the annual bonanza and its frenzied crowds was threatened with irrelevance, as deal-hungry shoppers for the first time spent more online than in bricks-and-mortar stores on Thanksgiving Day and Black Friday.

Final data for the five-day discount “window” – which stretches to “Cyber Monday” – are still emerging, and retailers still reacting to the news. But for the time being there are plenty of lessons from the frenzy:

1. The shift to online is accelerating faster than widely anticipated. With actual sales at physical stores coming in below most estimates and online sales topping forecasts – including $1.75 billion in the US on Thanksgiving Day alone, up 25% on 2014 – much of the retail industry appeared to be in shock by the speed with which consumers are “trading bricks for clicks.” This suggests that other projections about the migration to online retailing will need to be reassessed.

2. The shift isn’t just happening in the US. Payment Eye has a nice collection of images showing what it dubbed the “ghost towns” of major UK retailers on Black Friday, which suffered an almost 10% drop in footfall over the weekend – compared to a 12% rise in online transactions.

3. Mobile is taking a bigger share. An even bigger surprise to some retailers and analysts is the ballooning percentage of online transactions involving mobile devices, which made up roughly one-third of all such purchases (including 22% for smartphones), and nearly half of all traffic. Overall, the percentage of online sales completed using mobile devices was up more than a quarter over last year, according to IBM Watson Trend, which tracks retail e-commerce. More stunning was the experience of some individual retailers, including big-box giant Walmart, which said that 70% of the traffic to walmart.com on Cyber Monday came from mobile devices, and that a full 50% of all online orders the company had received over the holiday were from mobile, double the figure from last year.

4. But desktops retain certain benefits. Despite the jump in the percentage of consumers initiating and completing transactions on smartphones and tablets, a survey by the National Retail Federation found that eight out of 10 still planned to use a PC. In many cases holiday shoppers used a desktop to complete purchases initially researched on mobile devices. Meanwhile, according to IBM, purchases made on desktops tended to be almost 25% larger, with an average order value of $128 on desktops compared to $102 on smartphones. Meanwhile, data show that of the stunning $670 million Apple users spent online on Black Friday, iPads accounted for almost half ($302 million).

5. iOS continues to dominate. Another interesting data point of the weekend was the disproportionately large amount of money spent by consumers using Apple’s products. According to Adobe, a full $575 of the $799 million in mobile transactions made on Cyber Monday in the US came from iOS devices, compared to just $219 million from Android as an operating system.

6. Social media is playing an increasingly important role. While some big retailers may consider their forays into social media to be a mixed bag, there is no way to deny the role that social is playing in forming consumers’ opinions about brands and offerings. According to one survey, social media “buzz” around the Black Friday sales grew by 25% over last year, with Amazon alone enjoying almost 500,000 mentions, potentially each of which could have resulted in a sale.

7. Retailers weren’t properly prepared. Perhaps the most stark indication that the shift to online over the Black Friday weekend was a surprise is the multiple reports of online retailers failing to keep up with demand. In the US, numerous large retailers suffered outages and slow checkouts, including Target, Walmart and Victoria’s Secret. Meanwhile, according to a survey by Adobe, out-of-stock rates on retailers’ websites hit an all time high of 13%, or twice the normal rate.

8. But retailers are getting better at online. Despite the traffic overloads and other glitches, this year again showed how even many “bricks first” retailers are becoming more innovative. One notable example is Target, which for the second Black Friday in a row offered free shipping, and used the occasion to showcase a partnership with the app Curbside, which allows customers to play orders online and pick them up at a Target store without leaving their cars. The inventiveness of firms like Target may be one reason that, according to Adobe, large retailers enjoyed year-on-year online gains twice those of smaller ones (roughly 12% to 6%). Such figures also suggest that smaller online retailers may suffer as consumers migrate to mobile and favor apps over web-mobile shopping experiences.

9. These sale days are nearing their “use by” date. Despite the spread of Black Friday and Cyber Monday to markets beyond the US, both will likely suffer decreasing relevance as one sale bleeds into the next and online sales continue to eclipse those in bricks-and-mortar stores. Adobe notes that even among social mentions of Cyber Monday this year, only 56% were positive (For its part, Black Friday suffered a dismal 40% positive rate among social mentions.

10. The remote mobile payments space is more vital than ever. While the perfection and mass adoption of solutions for “proximity” mobile payments such as Apple Pay should remain a key objective for retailers and consumers, the accelerating shift to online underscores the equal importance of remote payments, including those developed by Cellum. People are becoming more willing to make remote purchases, and we need to make sure they also have the option to make remote payments, so that they can finish the whole shopping process from the comfort of their homes.”

Saturday, December 05, 2015

YouTube Red

Taken from Forbes article
YouTube Red's Streaming Could Be A Game-Changer, Unless ...

Michael Humphrey

It did not surprise longtime observers of YouTube to read the company is in talks with Hollywood to prepare a “robust” lineup of shows for its new subscription service, YouTube Red. From its earliest days, YouTube has been in a dance with traditional studios and broadcasters, sometimes leaving core creators wanting for attention. There was that time YouTube tangoed with CBS, back in what now feels like primordial days. Or the time they waltzed with all kinds of Hollywood creators to make “quality entertainment.” Other times YouTube followed big studios’ leads and tapped and then stomped around copyright infringement.

While you might think of YouTube’s “DNA” as cats and toddlers, it is much more complex than that. Yes, they have always wanted you to post your own videos. They have also wanted you to devotedly follow PewDiePie and Michelle Phan. But they have also wanted Hollywood to come play in the video sandbox. In the past, it did not go well. Hollywood content usually does not work well on YouTube and, it seems, the reverse might usually be true too.

But YouTube Red offers a new kind of opportunity, a merging of two forms. We’re already seeing it emerge, but YouTube Red could be the special place for it.

As the entertainment planets slowly align on any screen you want, “streaming” can mean anything from watching Elf to Empire to Epic Rap Battles of History. What constitutes “premium” viewing among those choices does not really matter as much as what makes you, the viewer, willing hit ”pay” instead of just “play.” We pay for Netflix, a font of binge-watching everything from movies, to TV series and its own original programming. We may pay for Hulu, cord-cutters’ entry into traditional TV, with its own original programming and now an easy way to get Showtime. We might pay for Amazon Prime for the same reasons, plus free shipping on some stuff.

YouTube Red, in comparison, is a set of features so far. No ads, download videos, play music in the background. Features are not enough (though early returns are positive) and YouTube knows it. Content was part of the plan from the outset and the company has a promising set of originals coming from its own platform’s biggest stars. But those originals come witht a risk. What quality or content enhancement must be met for YouTube followers not to feel bait-and-switched? At the same time, just how “robust” must a Hollywood line-up be to get Red competing with Netflix and Hulu?

A hybrid form of entertainment might answer these questions best and right now we are watching its potential play out on another platform. “Master of None” has been an unquestionable hit for Netflix.

Connection, what I think of “mass friendships,” is YouTube’s most important entertainment asset and the industry’s most radical new reality. Many YouTube stars have already proven they can significantly improve their production quality without losing that connection.

This could make YouTube Red true 21st Century entertainment. Unless … Google continues to mistake YouTube for a mere platform dancing with the stars. It must instead be a new kind of producer, that worries less about minutiae and more about the big picture.